By Maddison Molenaar 07/06/16 Climate change
A University of Auckland lecturer has criticised the current Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in New Zealand.
Prue Taylor, who teaches urban development, said the trading scheme has been effective at “distracting the country from doing anything serious on emissions” and “enabling our greenhouse gas emissions to continue climbing”.
She added that they needed to not only look at rectifying the problem, but also need to do two things.
“They need to consider whether or not we should continue to have an ETS,” said Mrs Taylor.
“The other thing they need to look at is if they decide to keep it and fix it’s problems, they have to also consider what policies need to fit our mould.”
Greenpeace climate campaigner Simon Boxer added that Greenpeace considered the ETS as “nothing short of a joke”, and too easy for companies to acquire credits.
“Basically it’s our belief that the government uses it internationally to sound like they’re trying to do something on climate change,” said Mr Boxer.
“It was never meant to be the sole way of dealing with emissions.”
Mr Boxer also cited the scandal where the Russian Mafia was creating false credits from Russia, which the New Zealand government was allowing companies to purchase.
Paul Young of Generation Zero, a youth-led climate change organisation in New Zealand, agreed that there was work needed on the scheme. However, he also said the ETS is “a tool that can be made to work”.
“It can be undermined by Government choices or some loopholes and that’s definitely what’s happened so far,” said Mr Young.
“It’s improving now that it’s operating as a New Zealand only scheme again.”
The emissions trading scheme was first introduced in 2002 under the Climate Change Response Act to meet obligations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The scheme was intended to reduce emissions from various companies across New Zealand involved in a number of industries including forestry, farming, and fishing.
The ETS has previously been criticised by a number of news organisations including the NZ Herald and Sunday Star Times for being a ‘step backwards’ for the fight against climate change.